Sweepstakes Casino Controversy – And Celebrities’ All-important Role

The smiling faces of Paris Hilton and Ryan Seacrest made surprise appearances before the Louisiana Senate for Friday’s hearing on unlawful sports betting.

No, they weren’t personally in presence, but the world-famous celebrities were notably included in a slide discussion on social and sweepstakes casinos – the questionable websites using both free casino-style games and profitable prizes, such as cash, gift cards or cryptocurrency. In one advertisement, the fist-pumping Seacrest is seen plugging Chumba Casino, where anyone can ‘play for free,’ while a crop-topped Hilton holds a chip for sweepstakes operator, Wow Vegas, in the other.

The sites are just two cogs in the multibillion-dollar industry that now discovers itself besieged by lawsuits. In the eyes of many video gaming corporations, not to discuss suit plaintiffs and state regulators, sweepstakes gambling establishments serve as standard casinos, only without the oversight, consumer defenses and tax laws. So not only can they avoid the steep 24-percent federal sports betting levy, however sweepstakes operators aren’t based on regulatory hurdles like anti-money laundering and responsible-gaming protections.

One operator, Australia-based Virtual Gaming Worlds (VGW), reported $4 billion in income last year alone. Now the company faces allegations of prohibited gambling in a New York lawsuit that declares VGW utilizes celeb endorsers to ‘create a veneer of authenticity’ around its item. (See VGW’s statement below)

‘I’m uncertain” if you don’t trust us, you can trust Paris Hilton” is a winning message for business operating multibillion-dollar prohibited operations out of places like Malta, Isle of Man, or US mail drops,’ Friday’s speaker, Howard Glaser of gaming corporation Light & Wonder, informed DailyMail.com.

Sweepstakes endorsers consist of a series of stars from sports betting lovers Drake and DJ Khaled to swimmer Michael Phelps, as well as NBA stars Karl-Anthony Towns and Paul George – none of whom offer any differences in between traditional sports betting and sweepstakes play.

Paris Hilton is seen plugging Wow Vegas, one of many sweepstakes casinos found online

Ryan Seacrest urges fans to play at Chumba Casino, where lots of – however not all – video games are totally free

Drake has a deal with social sweeps casino, Stake, that he routinely promotes on social media

Read More

Donald Trump ‘set to call NBA group owner as US ambassador to Italy’

Instead, advertisements generally center around the social aspect of the gambling establishments, while omitting the potential for actual gaming losses.

Others tempt clients with pledges of prizes. One such operator, Stake, ran a social networks ad revealing off Drake’s vehicles, airplanes and mansions before rotating to footage of the rapper playing online casino-style games.

‘Daddy, why do we have a lot cash?’ check out the first caption on the screen.

Another caption discussed: ‘Because I never ever quit.’

The discrepancy in between gaming sites and social or sweepstakes casinos is a bit intricate, however operators of the latter insist they’re not involved with the former.

A spokesperson for an industry trade group, the Social and Promotional Gaming Association (SPGA), discussed its members are not in direct competition with online gambling establishments and sportsbooks. Furthermore, according to SPGA information, most of the players on social-sweepstakes casinos are playing for totally free.

‘Most social sweeps consumers never buy,’ the SPGA spokesperson told DailyMail.com. ‘The minority of customers who make purchases do so in quantities far smaller than the normal deposit or bet size at real-money online gambling sites.’

Social gambling establishments offer clients a possibility to play casino-style video games with pals. Players have the choice to purchase worthless currency often referred to as ‘gold coins,’ which can not be exchanged genuine money, but can be used to open various functions within the games.

But within the world of social gambling establishments exists sweepstakes video gaming, permitting clients to acquire other currency known as ‘sweeps coins’ that can be exchanged for cash or other prizes.

And therein lies the potential for monetary losses, like the ones declared by complainants in Florida, Georgia, New Jersey and New York. One gamer told the Washington Post he lost more than $100,000 on sweepstakes gambling establishments in the past year after continuing to purchase more coins in pursuit of cash and other things of worth.

The Philadelphia 76ers’ Paul George is seen promoting a Worldwide Poker event

Social sweeps gambling establishment Stake ran an advertisement displaying Drake’s cars, airplanes and mansions

Karl-Anthony Towns of the New York Knicks is another NBA star plugging VGW’s Global Poker

Traditional online gambling establishments are prohibited in all however 7 states, which has helped to fuel the popularity of sweepstakes gambling establishments.

Anyone over the age of 18 can access the sweepstakes websites, which don’t need usually need identification. However, websites like Chumba will request IDs from gamers attempting to withdraw any funds.

Many sites, like the crypto-compatible Stake, enable customers to submit mail-in ask for complimentary sweeps coins, provided the players follow painfully particular guidelines. What’s more, players are frequently rewarded with sweeps coins just for registering, thereby providing them a reason to try their hands at any number of gambling establishment games for a chance to win – or lose – genuine cash.

So why are sweepstakes sites enabled to operate in 48 states, while online casinos are prohibited in all but 7?

According to the stakeholders, their item is the complimentary casino-style gaming, and the real-stakes competition is merely a means of promoting their support.

‘Social sweepstakes games are merely a kind of online home entertainment,’ an SPGA representative told DailyMail.com by e-mail. ‘No purchase is needed to dip into social gambling establishments with sweepstakes prizes. Consumers never have to pay for a chance to win prizes. That lack of a purchase requirement – or” factor to consider” – is a vital distinction in between social sweeps and conventional online gambling websites like gambling establishments.’

Consider the way that McDonald’s utilizes its annual Monopoly video game to promote its food: Customers aren’t paying to bet, however rather they’re buying hamburgers and fries that offer them the chance to win lucrative prizes, such as a $1 million jackpot.

And without a purchase requirement, or ‘consideration’, the video game itself does not fulfill the definition of gambling in the US.

‘Sweepstakes are an enduring method for promoting all sort of daily businesses in the United States, whatever from burgers to magazine memberships to coffee and home improvement shops,’ the SPGA spokesperson informed DailyMail.com. ‘Sweepstakes promos are regularly used by a who’s who of household names like AT&T, Chase, Home Depot, Marriott, Starbucks, and Wal-Mart.’

But to lots of sports betting industry experts, that argument doesn’t cut it.

For starters, gaming lawyer Daniel Wallach mentions, McDonald’s Monopoly video game does not run forever. Rather, it has a well-defined beginning and end, thus suggesting the sweepstakes is not the fast-food giant’s primary item. Instead, the sweepstakes is being utilized to promote genuine products like french fries, shakes, and the Filet-O-Fish.

‘They don’t last forever and they’re usually not connected to casino-style games of possibility,’ Wallach told DailyMail.com. ‘They’re simply money free gifts.

‘The sweepstakes [casinos] possess none of the qualities typically associated with McDonald’s-style sweepstakes promos,’ Wallach continued. ‘Besides running in perpetuity, the sweepstakes casinos use” casino-like” payouts, typically 80 percent or more of revenues, whereas the common payout portion for a momentary advertising sweepstakes is an unimportant share of the earnings earned by the business [usually less than one percent]’

Wallach is fast to compare the online social sweeps casinos to the internet cafes that sprang up in Florida, providing consumers the opportunity to play casino-style video games for genuine rewards. A lot of those brick-and-mortar facilities have actually considering that been shuttered over accusations of prohibited gambling.

DJ Khaled is amongst a number of celeb spokespeople for VGW’s Global Poker brand

Now, Wallach argues, social sweeps gambling establishments ought to face comparable analysis.

‘These differences are not approximate,’ Wallach stated of social sweeps gambling establishments. ‘They have actually repeatedly been mentioned by courts and state attorney general of the United States as key factors in figuring out that a sweepstakes promotion was in truth a guise for illegal gambling.’

One of the casino industry’s leading trade organizations, the American Gaming Association, is now pushing lawmakers to investigate sweepstakes operators and, sometimes, enact new legislation on the problem.

‘Consumers are being denied of defenses and states are forgoing considerable tax and profits opportunities as this gambling changes that conducted through regulated channels,’ checked out a well-circulated AGA memo.

And after that there are the complainants who have actually taken legal action against social gambling establishments in more than a dozen states.

Sweepstakes gambling establishment operators paid a combined $14.2 million in four cases in Kentucky without admitting any wrongdoing, according to the Washington Post. Meanwhile VGW accepted pay $11.75 million in one class-action suit, saying the settlement was made to avoid legal costs and continued litigation.

Michael Phelps has signed a deal with the VGW Group, which owns Global Poker

In the current suit, which is mainly similar to its predecessors, New York state homeowners Lamar Prater and Rebecca Pratt both claim to have lost well over $1,000 to VGW, which is explained in the filing as an ‘unlawful sports betting business. ‘

Apple and Google have actually likewise been named as defendants in claims for hosting the sweepstakes sites. But unlike VGW, neither tech business reacted to DailyMail.com’s request for comment.

‘We generally do not comment on matters before the courts,’ a VGW spokesperson informed DailyMail.com by means of e-mail. ‘However, we note that this claim has only just been submitted with the court and VGW has not been formally served.

‘We have full self-confidence in our compliance with all laws and guidelines where we run, and stay confident about the future,’ the spokesperson continued. ‘We continue to provide our free-to-play video games across many of North America, as we have for more than a decade, developing not just terrific games, user experiences and home entertainment, however also guaranteeing this is done safely, responsibly and at the highest level of standards.

‘More broadly, we ‘d repeat that class actions and other lawsuits and arbitrations are fairly common throughout the online social video games market (and the US more broadly), and our basic practice is that we plan to vigorously safeguard any claim which might be brought versus us.’

The issues between standard online sports betting and sweepstakes gambling establishments could show bothersome for some star endorsers.

Towns, a star center with the Knicks, and the 76ers’ George both endorse VGW’s Global Poker brand name while the NBA is partnered with standard gaming titans like FanDuel and DraftKings.

‘It’s ironic that professional athletes are hawking illegal sports betting wagering ‘sweeps’ websites while at the exact same time the leagues wish to predict a strong position against illegal gambling – particularly when trying to tamp down the occasional gaming scandal,’ Glaser told DailyMail.com.

It was just eight months ago that Toronto Raptors forward Jontay Porter received a lifetime ban from the NBA over accusations he conspired with bettors. However, to be clear, Porter’s scandal is unassociated to anything involving social or sweepstakes casinos.

Together with VGW, Apple and Google are being demanded hosting apparently illegal gambling websites

Regardless, Glaser sees sweepstakes gambling establishments as a major concern for leagues such as the NBA.

‘I ‘d expect that a league crackdown on athletes backing sweepstakes sites refers when, not if,’ Glaser added.

Neither an NBA spokesman nor the players’ representatives responded to DailyMail.com’s requests for remark. For that matter, spokespeople for Drake, DJ Khaled, Hilton, Seacrest and Phelps likewise neglected to respond to DailyMail.com e-mails.

Asked if their celeb endorsers have a duty to describe to customers the differences and similarities in between iGaming and sweepstakes casinos, VGW firmly insisted there is absolutely nothing more that needs to be done.

‘We have full confidence in our influencer and ambassadorial partnerships, and our organization practices more broadly,’ the representative said. ‘Some of our worths are” our players come first” and” we do what’s right”, and we put our values at the core of everything we do.’

Glaser, an outspoken opponent of sweepstakes websites, sees things in a different way.

‘Celebrities who lend their names to dubious prohibited sports betting websites are, at a minimum, putting their track records at threat as well as courting civil and class actions by consumers who declare harm,’ Glaser stated. ‘There is also some risk that state regulators and state chief law officers rope star endorsers into enforcement efforts for assisting in unlawful sports betting.’

New YorkNBADrakeParis Hilton